利益魔咒下法律正义的虚假本———重读马克思的《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

A164

基金项目:


False Noumenon of Law Justice in the Context of Interest Malediction: Rereading of Marx's The Argument about Act of Wood Steal
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》是青年马克思思想“在途中”的过渡性与转折性文本,再现其历 史构境和叙事逻辑,无论是思想史意义还是现实功效上,都不乏必要性所在。有关林木盗窃“罪 名”背后的非道德性之深究、政治权威沦为私利的奴仆的国家本质颠倒性之揭示,以及立法者本身 的不法症候之剖析,当系文本之命意所趋,也是马克思日后破灭古典自由主义价值悬设,走向本真 的历史深处和现实大地的始源地。同时文中还就马克思未加说明的“物质利益发表意见的难事” 之细节做了具体说明,对列宁的“转变说”做了辩证分析,并从本体论、方法论和价值论三重视角指 认出该文本意义所在。

    Abstract:

    The Argument about Act of Seal Wood is a transition text of youth Marx”thought “on the way”. Reappearance its historic condition and narrate logic is necessary for significances of thought history and realistic functions. Seeking immoral behind Steal Wood "imputation”, opening out reversal of nation essence with self-interest and vassal and taking apart illegitimacy symptom of lawmaker were not only a intention trend in the article but also a value assume and an origin that Marx overtumed classic liberalism later and made for the true historic depth and realistic mother earth. Also in this paper also Marx unannotated” material benefit to express an opinion on the difficult" details were explained in detail,to Lenin' s” change” to do the dialectical analysis,and from ontology, methodology and value theory of triple perspective to identify the text meaning.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

炎冰,熊一.利益魔咒下法律正义的虚假本———重读马克思的《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,17(4):7-13.(YAN Bing, et al. False Noumenon of Law Justice in the Context of Interest Malediction: Rereading of Marx's The Argument about Act of Wood Steal[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2015,17(4):7-13.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-03-02
  • 出版日期: