1917年俄国工农掌握政权的必然性——列宁与列甫·加米涅夫的意见分歧
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

A821.6

基金项目:


The Inevitability of Russian Workers and Peasants' Seizure of Power in 1917:A Divergence between Vladimir Lenin and Lev Kamenev
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    列宁1917年4月提出,推翻沙皇专制制度的民主革命已经完成,资产阶级掌握国家政权的政治局面决定了俄国革命必然要走向“第二阶段”,使国家政权转到无产阶级和贫苦农民手中。可是加米涅夫认为当时俄国的资产阶级革命尚未完成,不可推翻资产阶级临时政府。

    Abstract:

    In April, 1917, Lenin held that the democratic revolution of overthrowing Tsarist autocracy had completed and the bourgeoisie had been in power, which meant that Russian revolution was to march into the “second stage”, namely, the power should be transferred to the proletariat and poor peasants. Nevertheless, Kamenev believed that Russia's bourgeois revolution had not completed and it was unwise to overthrow the bourgeois provisional government. In October, Lenin pointed out that the Petrograd Soviet and Moscow Soviet had turned to the Bolshevik so the Party was ready and must lead an armed uprising and seize control of government. In contrast, Kamenev was opposed to armed uprising, especially before the second congress of the Soviet. History proves that Kamenev is wrong because his idea goes against the rule of revolutionary struggles.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

俞良早.1917年俄国工农掌握政权的必然性——列宁与列甫·加米涅夫的意见分歧[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,19(2):1-7.(YU Liangzao. The Inevitability of Russian Workers and Peasants' Seizure of Power in 1917:A Divergence between Vladimir Lenin and Lev Kamenev[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2017,19(2):1-7.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-04-28
  • 出版日期: