行政借道与浮动生长:政府主导型社区基金会参与社区治理的双重逻辑
作者:
作者单位:

(华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海200237 )

作者简介:

徐选国(1987—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事社会工作理论、社区社会学与公益慈善本土化研究。E-mail: xxg870530@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C916

基金项目:

“敦和·竹林计划”第四期专项研究课题(2020ZLJHZX-06)


Administrative Piggybacking and Floating Growth: The Double Logic of Government-Led Community Foundation Participation in Community Governance
Author:
Affiliation:

(School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    社区基金会的产生与发展是我国社区治理体制创新的一种尝试。在中央和地方制度驱动下,政府成为推动社区基金会生成和发展的主导性力量,旨在通过社区基金会的“社区性”与“公益性”优势回应社区治理难题。区别于传统社会组织与政府的关系模式,政府对社区基金会采取借道的行动逻辑,而社区基金会在发展实践中则逐渐形成浮动式的自主生长逻辑。借助“行政借道组织”的分析框架发现,政府在助推社区基金会参与社区治理时形成压力驱动、功能补位、制造绩效的行政逻辑,而社区基金会则通过组织外形化、造血式发展、依附式嵌入等策略参与社区治理,二者形成共生互补型关系。这种共生互补型关系的内在机理在于:政府与社区基金会之间的目标契合作为生成内驱力(利益机制),朝向社会化的合作供给与服务机制作为发展内驱力(社会机制),以及政府主导下的组织借力与治理创新作为成长内驱力(吸纳机制)。社区基金会的健康发展,将有利于助推第三次分配机制和共同富裕目标的实现进程。

    Abstract:

    The emergence and development of community foundations is an attempt to innovate the community governance system in China. Driven by the central and local systems, the government has become the leading force in promoting the emergence and development of community foundations, aiming to respond to community governance challenges through the “community” and “public welfare” advantages of community foundations. In contrast to the traditional relationship between social organizations and the government, the government adopts a piggybacking logic for community foundations, while community foundations gradually form a floating space for autonomous growth in their development practice. With the analytical framework of “administrative piggybacking organization”, we find that the government forms the administrative logic of pressure-driven, function-complementing, and performance-making in promoting community foundation participation in community governance, while community foundations participate in community governance through strategies such as organizational shaping, blood-making development, and dependent embedding. There is a symbiotic and complementary relationship between government and community foundation. The internal mechanism of this relationship is that the government and the community foundation have a common goal as the internal driving force of generation (interest mechanism), the internal driving force of development (social mechanism) as the mechanism of cooperation and service toward socialization, and the internal driving force of growth (absorption mechanism) as the government-led organizational lending and governance innovation. The healthy development of community foundations will contribute to the practice process of the third distribution mechanism and the goal of common prosperity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐选国,王曼曼.行政借道与浮动生长:政府主导型社区基金会参与社区治理的双重逻辑[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,25(1):12-23.(XU Xuanguo, WANG Manman. Administrative Piggybacking and Floating Growth: The Double Logic of Government-Led Community Foundation Participation in Community Governance[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2023,25(1):12-23.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-06
  • 出版日期: