地下构筑物对地下水头和滞留时间的影响机制
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河海大学地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京211100;2.江苏省水文地质工程地质调查大队,江苏 淮安210049;3.中国地质调查局南京地质调查中心,江苏 南京210016;4.河海大学水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京210098;5.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京210098 )

作者简介:

井淼(1989—) ,男,副教授,博士,主要从事岩土-地下水数值模拟技术研究。E-mail:mjing@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P641;TU91

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(52109012); 国家自然科学基金长江水科学研究联合基金项目(U2340212);江苏省自然资源科技项目(JSZRKJ202507)


Influence mechanism of underground structures on groundwater head and retention time
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;2.Jiangsu Province Hydrogeology Battalion,Huaian 210049, China;3.Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey, Nanjing 210016, China;4.TheNational Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;5.Collegeof Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China )

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于地下构筑物屏障效应的定义,引入等效屏障深度的概念,推导了含水层侧向定流量、侧向定水头和均匀面状补给3种边界条件下城区承压含水层地下水水头、地下水滞留时间分布和平均滞留时间的解析解,并设计了数值模拟试验进行对比验证。验证结果表明:解析解与数值解吻合效果较好,而仅当地下构筑物的尺寸相对较大时,由于水力弥散现象的出现,拟合效果欠佳;平均滞留时间的解析解在各种模拟工况下都与数值解吻合较好(相对误差不高于5.94%),表明即便在三维流场中也可以使用推导的解析解来估算承压含水层的平均滞留时间。进一步利用成都地铁2号线4个站点建造前后的现场数据进行解析解公式的验证计算,结果表明,相比于地下水水头,平均滞留时间对地下构筑物参数的变化表现出更高的敏感性。

    Abstract:

    According to the definition of the barrier effect of underground structures, the concept of equivalent barrier depth was introduced. Analytical solutions for the groundwater head, groundwater retention time distribution, and average retention time in the urban confined aquifer under three boundary conditions of constant flow rate, constant head, and diffuse recharge were derived. Numerical experiments were set up to verify the results, and the results show that the analytical solution is in good agreement with the numerical solution. The results demonstrate that the analytical solution is in strong agreement with the numerical solution.However, the fitting performance deteriorates due to hydrodynamic dispersion when the dimensions of the underground structure are relatively large. Moreover, the analytical solutions of the average retention time agree well with the numerical results in various simulation cases (with a relative error of no more than 5.94%). Even in the three-dimensional flow field, the derived analytical solutions can be used to estimate the average retention time of confined aquifers.Finally, the analytical solution is applied to the confined aquifer flow field before and after the construction of four subway stations in Chengdu Metro Line 2. The calculation results show that compared to the head, the retention time is more sensitive to the parameters of underground structures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

井淼,杨思敏,刘瑾,等.地下构筑物对地下水头和滞留时间的影响机制[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2025,53(5):116-126.(JING Miao, YANG Simin, LIU Jin, et al. Influence mechanism of underground structures on groundwater head and retention time[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences),2025,53(5):116-126.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-24
  • 出版日期: