考虑滞后效应的机器学习模型对淮北平原土壤温度的模拟研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河海大学水灾害防御全国重点实验室;2.太湖流域水文水资源监测中心(太湖流域水环境监测中心);3.武义县水务局;4.安徽省(水利部淮委)水利科学研究院五道沟水文水资源实验站)

作者简介:

王迪(2002—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水文物理规律模拟及水文预报研究。E-mail:241301010112@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S152.8

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52279018);安徽省(水利部淮委)水利科学研究院青年科技创新计划项目(KY202307);江苏省大学生创新创业项目(X2026102940117)


Simulation of soil temperature in the Huaibei Plain using machine learning models considering lag effects
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.State Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University;2.Taihu Basin Hydrology and Water Resources Monitoring Center (Taihu Basin Water Environment Monitoring Center);3.Wuyi County Bureau of Water Resources;4.Wudaogou Hydrology and Water Resources Experimental Station, Water Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province )

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于淮北平原五道沟实验站2000—2024年土壤温度与气象观测数据,采用相关性函数特征(CFF)方法系统分析了气温、气压等气象因子在不同土壤深度(10、20、40、80、160、320.cm)的滞后效应,将各深度滞后处理后的气象因子作为输入,驱动卷积神经网络(CNN)模型、长短期记忆网络(LSTM)模型及CNN-LSTM模型模拟6个深度土壤温度的演变过程,并评估了3个机器学习模型在不同深度的适用性与模拟精度。结果表明:气象因子的最优滞后时间随土壤深度增加而延长,浅层(10~20.cm)土壤滞后时间最短(0~3.d);中层(40~80.cm)延长至8~29.d;深层(160~320.cm)则延长至44~89.d;3个机器学习模型的模拟效果在不同深度表现出明显的分层差异,整体上浅层优于深层;CNN-LSTM模型在各深度均表现出更高的精度与稳定性,决定系数 R 2普遍维持在0.94以上,优于单一模型;在320.cm深层土壤中,CNN-LSTM模型的 R 2为0.941,较LSTM模型提升17%,较CNN模型提升45%,体现了卷积特征提取与时序记忆能力耦合的优势。

    Abstract:

    Based on the soil temperature and meteorological observation data from the Wudaogou Experimental Station in the Huaibei Plain from 2000 to 2024, the correlation function feature (CFF) method was adopted to systematically analyze the lag effects of meteorological factors, such as air temperature and air pressure, at different soil depths (10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 cm). Using the lag-processed meteorological factors at each depth as inputs, the convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and CNN-LSTM models were driven to simulate the evolution processes of soil temperature at the six depths, and the applicability and accuracy of the three machine learning models at different depths were evaluated. The results indicate that the optimal lag time of meteorological factors increases with the increase of soil depth. The lag time of shallow soil (10-20 cm) is the shortest (0-3 d); the lag time of middle soil (40-80 cm) is 8-29 d; the lag time of deep soil (160-320 cm) extends to 44-89 d. The simulation performance of the three machine learning models exhibits clear stratified differences at different depths, with the shallow layer generally outperforming the deep layer. The CNN-LSTM model demonstrates higher accuracy and stability at all depths, and its coefficient of determination ( R 2) is generally maintained above 0.94, outperforming the single models. In the deep soil of 320 cm, the R 2 of the CNN-LSTM model is 0.941, which improves by 17% compared with the LSTM model and 45% compared with the CNN model. This reflects the advantages of coupling convolutional feature extraction with temporal memory capability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王迪,鞠琴,莫李娟,等.考虑滞后效应的机器学习模型对淮北平原土壤温度的模拟研究[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2026,54(5):39-48, 90.(Wang Di, Ju Qin, Mo Lijuan, et al. Simulation of soil temperature in the Huaibei Plain using machine learning models considering lag effects[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences),2026,54(5):39-48, 90.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-09
  • 出版日期: