基于ANP-PP-SPA的区域洪灾风险评价模型研究
作者:
中图分类号:

TV87

基金项目:

江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(SJKY19_0501);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(学生项目)(2019B70414);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2019B11014)


Assessment model for regional flood risks based on ANP-PP-SPA
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对现有洪灾风险评价模型的缺陷与不足,从致灾因子、孕灾因子、承灾因子和减灾因子4个方面,通过对14项评价指标的分析与计算,构建洪灾风险评价体系。洪灾风险评价体系以网络层次分析法(ANP)求解主观权重,投影寻踪法(PP)求解客观权重,主客观综合权重与集对分析理论(SPA)耦合,构建基于ANP-PP-SPA的洪灾风险评价模型。以广东省英德市为例,验证洪灾风险评价模型的适用性。计算结果表明,英德市2016年的洪灾风险属于中等级别,符合英德市2016年的实际情况。洪灾风险评价模型不仅综合考虑了评价指标间的相互关系,还较好地体现了洪灾风险的模糊性和随机性,能够为区域洪灾风险决策和洪水管理提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    The flood risk assessment is an important basis for formulating the corresponding flood control and disaster reduction measures and plays an important role in the safety and protection of people's lives and property. In view of the deficiencies and shortcomings of the existing assessment models for flood risks, an assessment system for flood risks is established from the four aspects of disaster-causing, disaster-breeding, disaster-bearing and disaster mitigation through analysis and calculation of 14 evaluation indices. The subjective and the objective weights are solved by using the analytic network process(ANP)and the projection pursuit(PP), respectively. An assessment model for flood risks based on ANP-PP-SPA is established by coupling the subjective and objective weights with the set pair analysis(SPA). Taking Yingde City of Guangdong Province as an example, the applicability of the assessment model for flood risks is verified. The results show that the flood risk grade of 2016 in Yingde City is medium, which accords with the actual situation of 2016 in Yingde City. The assessment model considers the relationship among the indices and reflects the ambiguity and randomness of flood risks, and it can provide a scientific basis for the regional flood risk decision-making and the flood management.

    参考文献
    [1] 李博,甘恬静.基于ArcGIS与GAP分析的长株潭城市群水安全格局构建[J].水资源保护,2019,35(4):80-88.
    [2] 许怡,吴永祥,王高旭,等.伦敦城市洪水风险管理的启示[J].水利水电科技进展,2019,39(4):13-18.
    [3] HINKEL J, LINCKE D, VAFEIDIS A T, et al. Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014,111(9):3292-3297.
    [4] ARNELL N W, GOSLING S N. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale[J]. Climatic Change, 2016,134(3):387-401.
    [5] ELSHORBAGY A, BHARATH R, LAKHANPAL A, et al. Topography-and nightlight-based national flood risk assessment in Canada[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2017,21(4):2219-2232.
    [6] 钟桂辉,刘曙光,张枭鸣,等.阳澄淀泖区动态洪水风险图的编制及其管理系统的开发[J].水利水电科技进展,2017,37(6):62-68.
    [7] 徐镇凯,黄海鹏,魏博文,等.基于系统多层次灰色模型的洪灾风险综合评价方法:以鄱阳湖流域为例[J].南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(1):20-23.
    [8] 王兆礼,赖成光,陈晓宏.基于熵权的洪灾风险空间模糊综合评价模型[J].水力发电学报,2012,31(5):35-40.
    [9] 苑希民,桑林浩,沈福新,等.基于模糊层次分析法的京津冀洪灾风险评价[J].水利水电技术,2018,49(10):37-45.
    [10] 李晋辉,黄金池,何晓燕,等.基于突变理论的山洪灾害风险评价指标体系构建与应用[J].水利水电技术,2015,46(12):129-132.
    [11] 石晓静,查小春,刘嘉慧,等.基于云模型的汉江上游安康市洪水灾害风险评价[J].水利水电科技进展,2017,37(3):29-34.
    [12] 黄显峰,贾永乐,方国华.基于投影寻踪法的城市水生态文明建设评价[J].水资源保护,2016,32(6):117-122.
    [13] 王劲峰.中国自然灾害影响评价方法研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1993.
    [14] SAATY T L. Decision making with dependence and feedback[M]. Pittsburgh: RWS Publication, 1996.
    [15] 江新,李琦,沈力,等.基于ANP-灰色模糊的水电工程项目群风险预警研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(6):146-152.
    [16] 刘冀,王本德.基于组合权重的模糊可变模型及在防洪风险评价中应用[J].大连理工大学学报,2009,49(2):272-275.
    [17] 赵克勤,宣爱理.集对论:一种新的不确定性理论方法与应用[J].系统工程,1996(1):18-23.
    [18] 赵吴静,吴开亚,金菊良.防洪工程安全评价集对分析:可变模糊集模型[J].水电能源科学,2007(2):5-7.
    [19] 黄显峰,李宛谕,方国华,等.基于SPA和云理论的水资源承载能力评价研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(1):9-15.
    [20] 刘展志,黄显峰,方国华,等.基于改进云模型的堤坝除险加固效益后评价研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2017,28(5):223-231.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李宛谕,黄显峰,金国裕,等.基于ANP-PP-SPA的区域洪灾风险评价模型研究[J].水利经济,2020,38(4):45-50.(LI Wanyu, HUANG Xianfeng, JIN Guoyu, et al. Assessment model for regional flood risks based on ANP-PP-SPA[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources,2020,38(4):45-50.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1430
  • 下载次数: 2112
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-03