保护性耕作对呼兰河流域旱田土壤侵蚀影响的SWAT模拟
作者:
作者单位:

(1.东北农业大学水利与土木工程学院;2.黑龙江农业工程职业学院水利与建筑工程学院;3.黑龙江省农村水利水电保障中心;4.扬州大学水利科学与工程学院 )

作者简介:

王斌(1976—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事农业水文过程模拟研究。E-mail:wangbin@neau.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504203-02)


SWAT-based simulation of impact of conservation tillage on soil erosion in rainfed cropland of the Hulan River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Schoolof Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University; 2.Departmentof Hydraulic and Architectural Engineering, Heilongjiang Agricultural Engineering Vocational College; 3.Heilongjiang Province Rural Water Conservancy and Hydropower Security Center; 4.College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为在区域尺度评估保护性耕作对东北黑土区土壤侵蚀的阻控效果,构建了黑龙江省呼兰河流域的SWAT,设置8种模拟情景研究了免少耕播种、秸秆还田、深松及其技术组合对旱田土壤侵蚀的影响。结果表明:SWAT在率定期和验证期对径流与输沙的模拟效果良好,流量纳什效率系数分别为0.90和0.97,百分比偏差分别为9.59%和-12.63%;输沙量纳什效率系数分别为0.75和0.64,百分比偏差分别为-0.63%和-15.43%;5—9月作物全生育期内,旱田土壤侵蚀量先增大后减小,7月和8月土壤侵蚀量较大,5月较小;在阻控旱田土壤侵蚀效果方面,秸秆还田最佳,免少耕播种次之,深松欠佳,且深松在4月、5月和9月加剧了土壤侵蚀。因此,保护性耕作宜优先采用秸秆还田技术,其次为免少耕播种技术;多种技术集成时,推荐秸秆还田与免少耕播种技术组合。

    Abstract:

    To evaluate the effectiveness of conservation tillage in mitigating soil erosion at a regional scale in the black soil zone of Northeast China, a SWAT model was developed for the Hulan River Basin in Heilongjiang Province. Eight simulation scenarios were designed to investigate the effects of none/reduced tillage seeding, straw returning, subsoiling and their combinations on rainfed cropland soil erosion. The results indicate that the SWAT model performs well in simulating runoff and sediment yield during both the calibration and validation periods. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values for runoff were 0.90 and 0.97, with percentage bias (PBIAS) values of 9.59% and -12.63% during the calibration and validation periods, respectively. The NSE values for sediment yield were 0.75 and 0.64, with PBIAS values of -0.63% and -15.43% during the calibration and validation periods, respectively. During the crop growing season from May to September, the soil erosion in rainfed cropland first increased and then decreased, with higher erosion in July and August and lower erosion in May. In terms of erosion control effectiveness, straw returning showed the best performance, followed by none/reduced tillage seeding, whereas subsoiling was less effective and even intensified soil erosion in April, May and September. Therefore, straw returning is recommended as the priority conservation tillage practice, followed by none/reduced tillage seeding. When multiple practices are integrated, the combination of straw returning and none/reduced tillage seeding is recommended.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王斌,杨兴华,张秀芳,等.保护性耕作对呼兰河流域旱田土壤侵蚀影响的SWAT模拟[J].水利水电科技进展,2026,46(1):67-73, 89.(Wang Bin, Yang Xinghua, Zhang Xiufang, et al. SWAT-based simulation of impact of conservation tillage on soil erosion in rainfed cropland of the Hulan River Basin[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2026,46(1):67-73, 89.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-03
  • 出版日期: