病险水库除险加固效果的量化评价模型
作者:
中图分类号:

TV314

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(U1765205);国家自然科学青年基金(51609073);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(YS11001)


Quantitative evaluation model of reinforcement effect for dangerous reservoirs
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由于我国病险水库除险加固工程浩大,但除险加固效果综合评价的理论和方法较少,导致大量除险加固工程实际加固效果难以准确评估。为此,研究病险水库除险加固效果评价的定量分析方法,定义除险加固方案、功能指标康复程度、工程施工与除险加固效益等4个除险加固效果影响因素集,提出水库大坝除险加固效果影响因素的“积木模型”。提出水库除险加固效果评价指标量化方法,包括评价指标等级划分,时效与非时效评价指标量化方法,专家主观、客观权重确定以及指标静态、动态权重确定等,建立了水库大坝除险加固效果量化评价模型。将该模型运用于某病险水库除险加固效果评价中,模型评价结果与实际情况及验收结论吻合。

    Abstract:

    Reinforcement of dangerous reservoirs is a huge project in China, but the theories and methods of comprehensive assessment for the reinforcement effects are limited, leading to the difficulty to accurately evaluate the actual effects for a large number of reinforcement projects. The quantitative analysis of the evaluation method of the reinforcement effect for dangerous reservoirs is studied. Four reinforcement impact factors are defined, including the evaluation of reinforcing schemes, functional index rehabilitation, engineering construction and the benefit of reinforcement, based on which a “Building Block Model” of the influence factors is established to evaluate reservoir reinforcement effect. Quantification methods for the reinforcement effect evaluation indexes are proposed, including the evaluation indicator grading, time-dependent and time-independent evaluation indexes, subjective and objective weight of experts, static and dynamic weight. The quantitative evaluation model for evaluating the reinforcement effect of dangerous reservoirs is obtained. The model is applied to the reinforcement assessment of a dangerous reservoir and the results agree well with the actual situation and the acceptance conclusion.

    参考文献
    [1] 钮新强. 水库病害特点及除险加固技术[J].岩土工程学报, 2010,32(1):153-157.(NIU Xinqiang. Characteristics of reservoir defects and rehabilitation technology in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 153-157.(in Chinese))
    [2] GUPTA H K,RASTOGI B K.Dams and earthquakes[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,1976.
    [3] 吴中如,金永强,郑东健,等. 水库大坝中溃坝险情的分析研究[R].苏州:[出版者不详],2008.
    [4] 苏怀智,刘红萍. 高重力坝抗滑稳定安全度分析[J]. 水利水电科技进展,2011,31(4): 20-23.(SU Huaizhi, LIU Hongping. Stablility safety degree sliding in high gravity dams[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2011,31(4):20-23.(in Chinese))
    [5] 顾冲时.大坝服役非概率可靠性分析方法[J].水利水电科技进展, 2018,38(5):1-9.(GU Chongshi. Non-probabilistic reliability analysis method for dam service[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2018,38(5):1-9.(in Chinese))
    [6] 苏怀智. 基于全寿命周期成本理论的水工结构维修加固决策模型和方法[J].水利水电科技进展, 2018,38(5):38-42.(SU Huaizhi. The decision-making model and method of hydraulic structure maintenance and reinforcement based on the whole life cycle cost theory[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2018,38(5):38-42.(in Chinese))
    [7] 刘冲,沈振中,甘磊,等. 基于模糊灰色聚类-组合赋权的病险水库康复度综合评价方法[J].水利水电科技进展, 2018,38(3):36-41.(LIU Chong, SHEN Zhenzhong, GAN Lei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of rehabilitation degree of dangerous reservoirs based on fuzzy gray clustering and combination weighting method[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2018, 38(3):36-41.(in Chinese))
    [8] 吴焕新.病险水库除险加固治理效果综合评价体系研究[D].济南:山东大学,2009.
    [9] 李雷.大坝风险评价与风险管理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006.
    [10] 张计.土石坝安全与除险加固效果量化评价体系研究[D].武汉:长江科学院,2011.
    [11] 王宁.土石坝除险加固效果评价方法及其应用[D]. 南京:河海大学,2014.
    [12] 王娟,范九伦. 理想点法和模糊优选法的等价性[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013(4): 406-409.(WANG Juan, FAN Jiulun. The equivalence of TOPSIS and fuzzy optimization methods[J]. Journal of University of Jinan(Natural Science Edition),2013(4):406-409.(in Chinese))
    [13] 梁樑,熊立,王国华. 一种群决策中专家客观权重的确定方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术,2005(4): 652-655.(LIANG Liang, XIONG Li, WANG Guohua. New method for determining the objective weight of decision makers in group decision[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2005(4):652-655.(in Chinese))
    [14] ARAGONÉS B P, CHAPARRO G F, PASTOR F J, et al. An AHP(analytic hierarchy process)/ANP(analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects[J]. Energy,2014, 66: 222-238.
    [15] 黄曼丽,朱凌,尹华,等. 基于熵权的多目标综合评价方法在水利工程中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2008(12): 99-102.(HUANG Manli, ZHU Ling, YIN Hua, et al. Application of the multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight to hydroelectric projects[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower,2008(12):99-102.(in Chinese))
    [16] 李聪,申思然,刘江,等. 基于动态权重的土质岸坡稳定性模糊评价方法[J]. 长江科学院院报,2013(1): 15-20.(LI Cong, SHEN Siran, LIU Jiang, et al, Method of evaluating reservoir bank stability by multi-level variable fuzzy sets based on dynamic weight[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2013(1):15-20.(in Chinese))
    [17] 王宁,沈振中,徐力群,等.基于模拟退火层次分析法的病险水库除险加固效果评价[J].水电能源科学,2013(9):65-67.(Reinforcement effect evaluation of dangerous reservoir based on simulated annealing-analysic hierarchy process[J].Water Resources and Power,2013(9):65-67.(in Chinese))
    [18] 欧阳海滨,高立群,邹德旋,等. 和声搜索算法探索能力研究及其修正[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2014(1): 57-65.(OUYANG Haibin, GAO Liqun, ZOU Dexuan, et al. Exploration ability study of harmony search algorithm and its modification[J]. Control Theory and Applications,2014(1):57-65.(in Chinese))
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

沈振中,甘磊,徐力群,等.病险水库除险加固效果的量化评价模型[J].水利水电科技进展,2018,38(5):10-14.(SHEN Zhenzhong, GAN Lei, XU Liqun, et al. Quantitative evaluation model of reinforcement effect for dangerous reservoirs[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2018,38(5):10-14.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1644
  • 下载次数: 1835
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-27