Estimation of non-point source pollution load in upstream of Lijiang River
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

TV121+.1,X522

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Based on the hydrological and water quality data during 2005-2014, runoff division method, rainfall deduction method and runoff deduction method were used to evaluate the non-point source pollution respectively in the upstream of Lijiang River. Compared with rainfall deduction method and runoff deduction method, the accuracy of runoff division method is the highest. The relationship between pollution load difference and runoff difference in wet and dry period can be described by a linear equation, with R2 values greater than 0. 88. The calculated values of pollution load using runoff division method were significantly correlated with the measured values, and the R2 reached 0. 91. Compared with NH3-N and CODMn, the ratio of non-point source pollution to total pollution load of TP calculated by the different methods showed strong stability. The Average value caculated by runoff division method showed that the ratio of non-point source pollution to total pollution load of CODMn, NH3-N and TP was 0. 70, 0. 73 and 0. 74 respectively. It shows that non-point source pollution load highly contributes to the water quality in the upstream of Lijiang River.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

代俊峰,全秋慧,方荣杰,等.漓江流域上游非点源污染负荷估算[J].水利水电科技进展,2017,37(5):57-63.(DAI Junfeng, QUAN Qiuhui, FANG Rongjie, et al. Estimation of non-point source pollution load in upstream of Lijiang River[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2017,37(5):57-63.(in Chinese))

Copy
Related Videos

Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:November 12,2016
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: September 12,2017
  • Published: September 10,2017
Article QR Code