河泥与海泥陶粒填料生物滞留设施径流控制试验
作者:
作者单位:

(1.北京建筑大学城市雨水系统与水环境教育部重点实验室,北京 100044;2.北京节能减排与城乡可持续发展省部共建协同创新中心,北京 100044;3.北京雨人润科生态技术有限责任公司,北京 100080)

作者简介:

李俊奇(1967—),男,教授,博士,主要从事城市雨水控制利用与水环境生态技术研究。E-mail:lijunqi@bucea.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

X52

基金项目:

北京市自然科学基金重点项目(8191001)


Experiment on runoff control of bioretention facilities using river mud and sea mud ceramsite as fillers
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment (Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100044, China;2.Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Conservation & Emission Reduction and Sustainable Urban-Rural Development in Beijing, Beijing 100044, China;3.Beijing Yuren Raineco Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探讨河道疏浚泥(河泥)和海洋疏浚泥(海泥)资源化用于生物滞留填料的可行性,分别以河泥和海泥为主要原料制备陶粒,并以两种陶粒为填料搭建了生物滞留试验柱,通过径流雨水渗滤模拟试验,研究了两种试验柱在不同降雨重现期、不同降雨历时和不同污染物质量浓度条件下的运行效果。结果表明:河泥与海泥陶粒作为填料时,生物滞留柱中COD、TP、TN和NH3-N的淋失量较低,污染物淋失风险较小;在降雨重现期为0.5a时,河泥与海泥陶粒填料生物滞留柱出流时间分别为49min和48min,平均水量削减率分别为34.36%和44.87%,比传统砂土填料生物滞留柱分别提高了34.75%和75.96%;河泥与海泥陶粒填料生物滞留柱对污染物的削减效果明显,对COD、TP、TN、NH3-N平均负荷削减率分别为50.27%、99.08%、50.72%、79.15%与54.20%、99.58%、55.43%、80.86%,均高于传统砂土填料生物滞留柱。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the feasibility of recycling river dredged mud (river mud) and sea dredged mud (sea mud) to bioretention fillers, we prepared two kinds of ceramsite with river mud and sea mud, respectively. Bioretention experiment columns were built using the two kinds of ceramsite as fillers. The efficiency of the two columns under different rainfall return periods, rainfall durations and pollutant mass concentrations were studied by simulation experiments of runoff rainwater infiltration. The results showed that the leaching amount of COD, TP, TN and NH3-N in bioretention columns were low when river mud and sea mud ceramsite were used as fillers, which means that there was little risk of pollutant leaching. When the return period of rainfall was 0.5 a, the outflow duration of bioretention columns with river mud and sea mud ceramsite fillers were 49min and 48min, and the average water reduction rates were 34.36% and 44.87%, respectively, which are 34.75% and 75.96% higher than traditional bioretention columns with sandy soil filler. Bioretention columns with river mud and sea mud ceramsite fillers show significant effect on pollutants reduction, with average load reduction rates of COD, TP, TN, NH3-N being 50.27%, 99.08%, 50.72%,79.15% and 54.20%, 99.58%, 55.43%, 80.86%, respectively, which were better than traditional bioretention columns with sandy soil filler.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李俊奇,张兴宇,林聪,等.河泥与海泥陶粒填料生物滞留设施径流控制试验[J].水资源保护,2023,39(3):229-236.(LI Junqi, ZHANG Xingyu, LIN Cong, et al. Experiment on runoff control of bioretention facilities using river mud and sea mud ceramsite as fillers[J]. Water Resources Protection,2023,39(3):229-236.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-30
  • 出版日期: