不同优化算法在新安江模型参数率定中的效果评估
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京 210098;2.河海大学水安全与水科学协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210098;3.浙江省水文管理中心,浙江 杭州 310009)

作者简介:

石朋(1976—),男,教授,博士,主要从事水文水资源及分布式流域水文模拟研究。E-mail:ship@hhu.edu.cn 通信作者:瞿思敏(1977—),女,教授,博士,主要从事水文水资源及分布式流域水文模拟研究。E-mail:wanily@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TV122+.2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52179011)


Evaluation of different optimization algorithms in parameter calibration of Xin'anjiang model
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;2.National Cooperative Innovation Center for Water Safety & Hydro Science, Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China;3.Zhejiang Hydrologic Management Center, Hangzhou 310009, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对水文模拟预报中需要寻求实用、稳健、高效的优化算法并据此确定参数的全局最优解的问题,以綦江流域典型控制断面五岔断面为研究对象,分别选取GA、SCE-UA、CMA-ES、PSO等4种优化算法进行分布式新安江模型汇流参数率定,并从有效性、稳定性、耗时和效率4个方面评估算法的参数率定性能。结果表明:CMA-ES算法优化效果最佳,相同迭代次数下耗时最少;SCE-UA算法稳定性和效率最高,但耗时随着迭代次数增大而显著增加;PSO算法有效性和效率相对较优,但稳定性最差;GA算法耗时相对较少,优化效果和效率最差;综合性能从优到劣依次为CMA-ES算法、SCE-UA算法、PSO算法、GA算法。

    Abstract:

    In response to the problem of finding a practical, robust, and efficient optimization algorithms in hydrological simulation forecasting and determining the global optimal solution of parameters based on them, the Wucha section, a typical control section in the Qijiang River Basin, was selected as the research object. Four optimization algorithms, GA、SCE-UA、CMA-ES、PSO, were selected to calibrate the convergence parameters of the distributed Xin'anjiang model. The parameter calibration performance of the algorithm was evaluated from four aspects:effectiveness, stability, time consumption, and efficiency. The results show that CMA-ES algorithm has the best optimization effect and the least time consumption under the same number of iterations. SCE-UA algorithm has the highest stability and efficiency, but its time consumption significantly increases with the increase of iteration times. PSO algorithm has relatively better effectiveness and efficiency, but the stability is the worst. GA algorithm takes relatively less time and has the worst optimization effect and efficiency. The comprehensive property is ranked from best to worst as CMA-ES, SCE-UA, PSO, and GA algorithms.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

石朋,陆美霞,吴洪石,等.不同优化算法在新安江模型参数率定中的效果评估[J].水资源保护,2023,39(4):19-25, 41.(SHI Peng, LU Meixia, WU Hongshi, et al. Evaluation of different optimization algorithms in parameter calibration of Xin'anjiang model[J]. Water Resources Protection,2023,39(4):19-25, 41.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-01
  • 出版日期: