金沙江流域实际蒸散发GRACE重力卫星遥感重构不确定性分析
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京 210098;2.长江保护与绿色发展研究院,江苏 南京 210098;3.中国气象局水文气象重点开放实验室,江苏 南京 210098;4.水利部水利大数据重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;5.江苏省水利科学研究院,江苏 南京 210017)

作者简介:

李炳锋(1999—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:1164161904@qq.com 通信作者:张珂(1979—),男,教授,博士,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:kzhang@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51879067);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(B220203051)


Uncertainty analysis of actual evapotranspiration reconstructed with GRACE gravity satellite data in the Jinsha River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University,Nanjing 210098, China;2.Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China;3. China Meteorological Administration Hydro-Meteorology Key Laboratory, Nanjing 210098, China;4. Key Laboratory of Water Big Data Technology of Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, China;5.Jiangsu Hydraulic Science Institute, Nanjing 210017, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    通过GLDAS数据对GRACE重力卫星水储量数据进行降尺度处理,采用水量平衡方程重构了金沙江流域2007—2016年25个子流域月实际蒸散发数据,采用拉丁超立方抽样法确定各水量平衡参数的不确定性,并对各参数和实际蒸散发进行不确定性分析。结果表明:抽样样本数为415时,抽样结果较好,各参数中降水量的不确定性变化范围最大,水储量变化次之,径流深最小;金沙江流域年均实际蒸散发不确定性变化范围为46.02~146.19mm,空间分布总体上表现为自西向东、自北向南逐渐增大的趋势,信噪比分布与不确定性分布有一定的相似性;在年、季节尺度下,流域内不同土地利用类型的实际蒸散发不确定性由大到小排序均为林地、灌丛、农田、草地、其他占地类型;实际蒸散发不确定性在季节上呈现出差异性,夏季不确定性变化范围最大,冬季最小。

    Abstract:

    GLDAS data was used to downscale the water storage data of GRACE gravity satellites, and the actual monthly evapotranspiration (AET) data of 25 sub-basins in the Jinsha River Basin from 2007 to 2016 were reconstructed with the water balance equation. The uncertainty of each water balance parameter was quantified by the Latin hypercube sampling method, and the uncertainty analysis of every parameter and AET was carried out. The results showed that the sampling results were satisfactory when the sample size was set to 415.Precipitation had the largest uncertainty range, followed by the change of water storage, and runoff depth had the smallest uncertainty range. The spatial distribution of AET uncertainty in the Jinsha River Basin showed an increasing trend from west to east and from north to south, with the data ranging from 46.02 mm to 146.19 mm, and it was similar to the spatial distribution of AET signal-to-noise ratio. At the annual and seasonal scales, the AET uncertainty of different land-use types in the river basin was ranked from high to low as follows:woodland, shrub, farmland, grassland, and other land types, and the AET uncertainty varied seasonally, with the largest variation range in summer and the smallest in winter.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李炳锋,张珂,鞠艳,等.金沙江流域实际蒸散发GRACE重力卫星遥感重构不确定性分析[J].水资源保护,2023,39(4):159-166.(LI Bingfeng, ZHANG Ke, JU Yan, et al. Uncertainty analysis of actual evapotranspiration reconstructed with GRACE gravity satellite data in the Jinsha River Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection,2023,39(4):159-166.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-01
  • 出版日期: