机器学习模型与物理机制模型在长诏水库流域实时洪水预报中的比较研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京 210098;2.杭州市余杭区水文水资源监测站, 浙江 杭州 311115;3.浙江省水利水电勘测设计院有限责任公司,浙江 杭州 310002;4.浙江省水利河口研究院,浙江 杭州 310020 )

作者简介:

瞿思敏(1977—),女,教授,博士,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:wanily@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

浙江省自然科学基金联合基金项目(LZJMZ24D050007)


Comparative study of machine learning model and physical mechanism model in flood forecasting of the Changzhao Reservoir Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;2.Yuhang Hydrology and Water Resources Monitoring Station, Hangzhou 311115, China;3.Zhejiang Provincial Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310002, China;4.Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary, Hangzhou 310020, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以曹娥江长诏水库流域为研究区域,选择影响洪水过程的降雨、径流作为主要影响因子构建流域长短期记忆网络(LSTM)模型,分析流域水文气象特征和产汇流机理,并与新安江模型模拟结果进行对比分析。结果表明:LSTM模型和新安江模型在长诏水库流域洪水模拟中应用效果较好,LSTM模型合格率更高,且LSTM模型平均径流深和洪峰模拟结果的相对误差更小,精度更高,而新安江模型确定性系数比较稳定且峰现时差更小;LSTM模型降低了对人为经验的依赖,可用于对精度要求较高的实时洪水预报;新安江模型对于一些突发事件能够结合参数表达的物理过程解释误差来源,更适用于极端洪水等复杂情景分析和物理过程解释的研究。

    Abstract:

    Taking the Changzhao Reservoir Basin of the Cao’e River as the study area, rainfall and runoff were selected as the primary influencing factors to construct the longshort term memory network (LSTM) model. The hydrometeorological characteristics and runoff generation mechanism in the basin were analyzed using the LSTM model and compared with the simulation results of the Xin’anjiang model. The results indicate that the LSTM model and the Xin’anjiang model perform well in flood simulation in the Changzhao Reservoir Basin. The LSTM model has a higher qualification rate, and the relative errors of the LSTM model in simulation of average runoff depth and peak flow are smaller, demonstrating a higher accuracy of the LSTM model. Meanwhile, the Xin’anjiang model has a relatively stable coefficient of determination and smaller peak occurrence time difference. The LSTM model reduces the dependence of the model on human experience and can be used for realtime flood forecasting with high precision requirements. The Xin’anjiang model can explain the source of errors based on the physical process expressed by parameters for some emergencies, and is more suitable for analysis of complex scenarios such as extreme floods and explanation of physical processes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

瞿思敏,余裕,方正,等.机器学习模型与物理机制模型在长诏水库流域实时洪水预报中的比较研究[J].水资源保护,2025,41(5):73-78, 88.(QU Simin, YU Yu, FANG Zheng, et al. Comparative study of machine learning model and physical mechanism model in flood forecasting of the Changzhao Reservoir Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection,2025,41(5):73-78, 88.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-21
  • 出版日期: