协同治理视角下中国水治理效能的演变特征与贡献测量
作者:
作者单位:

(1.北方工业大学经济管理学院,北京 100144;2.北方工业大学资源与环境管理研究中心,北京 100144 )

作者简介:

吴丹(1986—),男,教授,博士,主要从事城市治理与资源环境管理研究。E-mail:wu_daniel@163. com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科基金后期项目(22FGLB016);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJCZH176);北方工业大学北京城市治理研究基地项目(2025CSZL06)


Evolutionary characteristics and contribution measurement of China’s water governance effectiveness from the perspective of collaborative governance
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China;2.Research Center for Resource and Environmental Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    从水资源、水环境和水生态协同治理视角,构建了水治理效能评估指标体系与综合评估模型,通过明确中国水治理效能演变特征,测量各关键因素对水治理效能的贡献,验证了该指标体系与模型的有效性。研究结果表明:1980—2022年中国水治理效能历经缓慢提升、快速提升、增速减缓3个时期,各时期特征明显;第1时期集约利用能力相对提升较快,生态修复与环境保护措施不足;第2时期安全保障能力快速提升并居于首位,集约利用和环境保护能力也大幅提升,生态修复能力提升缓慢;第3时期水资源、水环境和水生态治理实现了均衡发展,协同治理等级从失调转为优质协同,但仍存在农业用水控制、排污控制和生态修复等难题。

    Abstract:

    The evaluation index system and comprehensive assessment model for water governance effectiveness were constructed from the perspective of coordinated governance of water resources,water environment,and water ecology, and the validity of this index system and model was verified by clarifying the evolution characteristics of China’s water governance effectiveness and measuring the contribution of each key factor to water governance effectiveness. The research found that from 1980 to 2022, China’s water governance effectiveness experienced three periods:slow improvement, rapid improvement, and a slowdown in the growth rate. The characteristics of each period were distinct. In the first period,the ability for intensive utilization increased relatively rapidly, while ecological restoration and environmental protection measures were insufficient. In the second period,the security guarantee ability improved rapidly and ranked first,while the abilities for intensive utilization and environmental protection also significantly improved,but the ecological restoration ability improved slowly. In the third period, water resources, water environment,and water ecology governance achieved balanced development, and the coordination level shifted from imbalance to high-quality coordination. However,there were still problems such as control of agricultural water use, pollution control, and ecological restoration.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴丹,陈江南.协同治理视角下中国水治理效能的演变特征与贡献测量[J].水资源保护,2025,41(5):268-277.(WU Dan, CHEN Jiangnan. Evolutionary characteristics and contribution measurement of China’s water governance effectiveness from the perspective of collaborative governance[J]. Water Resources Protection,2025,41(5):268-277.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-21
  • 出版日期: