引入质量守恒的LSTM模型在径流模拟中的应用及其可解释性分析
作者:
作者单位:

(1.云南电网有限责任公司,云南 昆明 650228;2.河海大学水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;3.河海大学水文水资源学院,江苏 南京 210098;4.河海大学长江保护与绿色发展研究院,江苏 南京 210098;5.中国气象局水文气象重点开放实验室,江苏 南京 210098;6.水利部水利大数据重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;7.水利部水循环与水动力系统重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098 )

作者简介:

蒋燕(1981—),女,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事水电调度与发供电平衡研究。E-mail:jiangyan@dltd.yn.csg.cn 通信作者:牛杰帆(1997—),女,博士研究生,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:jiefanniu@hhu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国南方电网云南电网有限责任公司科技项目(YNKJXM20222329);国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3006500);国家自然科学基金项目(52009028);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(B240203007)


Runoff simulation based on mass-conserving LSTM model and its interpretability analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd., Kunming 650228, China; 2.TheNational Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3.College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4.YangtzeInstitute for Conservation and Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 5.China Meteorological Administration HydroMeteorology Key Laboratory, Nanjing 210098, China; 6.KeyLaboratory of Water Big Data Technology of Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, China; 7.Key Laboratory of HydrologicCycle and HydrodynamicSystem of Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, China)

Fund Project:

undefined

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为评估引入质量守恒的长短时记忆网络(MC-LSTM)模型在径流模拟中的应用效果,以云南梨园流域和乌弄龙流域为例,采用MC-LSTM模型在不同预见期进行径流模拟,将其与标准长短时记忆网络(LSTM)模型和支持向量回归(SVR)模型进行对比,并基于SHAP方法探讨气象特征对MC-LSTM模型径流预测的贡献,分析模型的可解释性。结果表明:在无历史径流观测数据输入的情况下,MC-LSTM 模型与LSTM模型模拟精度优于SVR模型,MC-LSTM模型在汛期性能略优于LSTM模型;纳入历史实测径流后,3种模型在短预见期模拟中均表现出较高精度,随着预见期的延长,MC-LSTM模型精度缓慢下降,但模型整体稳定,在中长预见期径流模拟过程中,MC-LSTM模型相较LSTM模型和SVR模型表现良好;梨园流域和乌弄龙流域径流预测的主要影响因素分别为气温和降水,主导气象因子的差异反映了不同流域的产流过程特征差异,MC-LSTM模型的可解释性分析有助于进一步明晰流域产流机制。

    Abstract:

    To evaluate the application effectiveness of the mass-conserving long short-term memory(LSTM) and support vector regression (SVR) models. Furthermore, the SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) method was applied to explore the contribution of meteorological features to the runoff prediction of the MC LSTM model and to analyze the interpretability of the model. The results show that, without the input of historical runoff observation data, the simulation accuracy of the MC LSTM and LSTM models is superior to that of the SVR model, and the MC LSTM model slightly outperforms the LSTM model during the flood season. When historical runoff observation data are included, the three models show high accuracy in short term simulations. As the lead time increases, the accuracy of the MC LSTM model declines gradually, but the model remains stable and performs better than the LSTM and SVR models in medium to long term runoff simulations. The main influencing factors of runoff prediction in the Liyuan and Wunonglong basins are temperature and precipitation, respectively. These differences in dominant factors reflect the distinct characteristics of runoff generation processes in different basins, and the interpretability analysis of the MC LSTM model helps clarify the mechanisms of runoff generation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

蒋燕,牛杰帆,张珂,等.引入质量守恒的LSTM模型在径流模拟中的应用及其可解释性分析[J].水资源保护,2025,41(6):149-157.(JIANG Yan, NIU Jiefan, ZHANG Ke, et al. Runoff simulation based on mass-conserving LSTM model and its interpretability analysis[J]. Water Resources Protection,2025,41(6):149-157.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-05
  • 出版日期: