基于SCS模型和新安江模型的雨量预警指标综合动态阈值对比
作者:
中图分类号:

P338+.9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51420105014)


Comparison of comprehensive dynamic threshold of rainfall warning indicators based on SCS model and Xinanjiang model
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解决下垫面条件复杂性和前期影响雨量不确定性给小流域山洪预警带来的难题,选取广东省罗定市太平镇太北村和罗镜镇大平岗村两个小流域作为研究对象,通过水位流量关系和致灾水位插值得到致灾流量,由致灾流量通过三角汇流曲线反推得到临界产流量,考虑前期影响雨量的因素,分别通过SCS模型和新安江模型反推得到动态临界雨量,并与广东省用国家新技术方法算出的临界雨量进行对比。结果显示,两种模型在临界雨量的计算上均满足预警要求,但基于新安江模型计算得出的结果偏安全,在山洪预警中更加可靠。

    Abstract:

    In order to solve the problems caused by the complexity of underlying surface conditions and the uncertainty of antecedent precipitation in mountainous small watershed, two small watersheds, Taibei village in Taiping Town and Dapinggang village in Luojing town of Luoding City, were selected as the research objects. The disaster-causing flow, which is interpolated by the stage-flow relation and the disaster-causing water level, can be used to calculate the critical runoff with the method of triangle confluence curve. With the consideration of the antecedent precipitation, SCS model and Xinanjiang model are applied to calculate the dynamic rainfall threshold reversely, and the dynamic rainfall threshold will be compared with the critical rainfall calculated by the national new technology method used in Guangdong Province. The results show that both models meet the requirements in the calculation of rainfall threshold. Relatively speaking, the results based on the Xinanjiang model are safer and more reliable in the flash flood warning.

    参考文献
    [1] 王东升,袁树堂,杨祺.金沙江流域云南片水文极小值演变及生态基流保障分析[J].水资源保护,2019,35(4):35-41.(WANG Dongsheng,YUAN Shutang,YANG Qi.Analysis of hydrological minimum evolution and ecological base flow guarantee in Yunnan area of Jinshajiang River Basin,China[J].Water Resources Protection,2019,35(4):35-41.(in Chinese))
    [2] CARPENTER T M,SPERFSLAGE J A,GEORGAKAKOS K P,et al.National threshold runoff estimation utilizing GIS in support of operational flash flood warning systems[J].Journal of Hydrology,1999,224(1):21-24.
    [3] HAPUARACHCHI H A P,WANG Q J,PAGANO T C.A review of advances in flash flood forecasting[J].Hydrological processes,2011,25(18):2771-2784.
    [4] LOOPER J P,VIEUX B E.An assessment of distributed flash flood forecasting accuracy using radar and rain gauge input for a physics-based distributed hydrologic model[J].Journal of Hydrology,2011,412/413:114-132.
    [5] 任春凤.山东省小流域山洪灾害预警指标分析研究与应用[D].济南:山东大学,2015.
    [6] 陈桂亚,袁雅鸣.山洪灾害临界雨量分析计算方法研究[J].人民长江,2005(12):40-43,54.(CHEN Guiya,YUAN Yaming.Research on analysis and computation method of critical precipitation amount of torrential flood[J].Yangtze River,2005(12):40-43,54.(in Chinese))
    [7] 陈瑜彬,杨文发,许银山.不同土壤含水量的动态临界雨量拟定方法研究[J].人民长江,2015,46(12):21-26.(CHEN Yubin,YANG Wenfa,XU Yinshan.Study of dynamic critical precipitation drafted method under different soil moisture content level[J].Yangtze River,2015,46(12):21-26.(in Chinese))
    [8] 毛北平.垂向混合产流模型在无资料地区山洪灾害临界雨量计算中的应用[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2016,24(4):720-730.(MAO Beiping.Application of the vertically-mixed runoff model to the calculation of the rainfall threshold of flash floods in ungauged basins[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2016,24(4):720-730.(in Chinese))
    [9] 樊静,江远安,陈颖,等.基于HBV模型的开都河致灾洪水临界雨量分析[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2014,8(6):31-35.(FAN Jing,JIANG Yuanan,CHEN Ying,et al.The critical rainfall calculation in kaidu river based on hbv hydrological model[J].Desert and Oasis Meteorology,2014,8(6):31-35.(in Chinese))
    [10] 卢燕宇,谢五三,田红.基于水文模型与统计方法的中小河流致洪临界雨量分析[J].自然灾害学报,2016,25(3):38-47.(LU Yanyu,XIE Wusan,TIAN Hong.Analysis of critical flood causing rainfalls in medium and small rivers based on hydrological model and statistical method[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2016,25(3):38-47.(in Chinese))
    [11] 练继建,杨伟超,徐奎,等.山洪灾害预警研究进展与展望[J].水力发电学报,2018,37(11):1-14.(LIAN Jijian,YANG Weichao,XU Kui,et al.Advances and prospect of flash flood forecasting[J].Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering,2018,37(11):1-14.(in Chinese))
    [12] 广东省水文局.广东省暴雨径流查算图表使用手册[R].广州:广东省水文局,1991.
    [13] 刘家福,蒋卫国,占文凤,等.SCS模型及其研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):120-124.(LIU Jiafu,JIANG Weiguo,ZHAN Wenfeng,et al.Processes of SCS model for hydrological simulation:a review[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(2):120-124.(in Chinese))
    [14] 许波刘,董增川,洪娴.集总式喀斯特水文模型构建及其应用[J].水资源保护,2017,33(2):37-42,58.(XU Boliu,DONG Zengchuan,HONG Xian.Lumped karst hydrological model and its application[J].Water Resources Protection,2017,33(2):37-42,58.(in Chinese))
    [15] WILLIAMS J R,LASEUR W V.Water yield model using SCS curve numbers[J].Journal of the Hydraulics Division,1976,102(9):1241-1253.
    [16] 齐苑儒,李怀恩,李家科,等.西安市非点源污染负荷估算[J].水资源保护,2010,26(1):9-12,74.(QI Yuanru,LI Huaien,LI Jiake,et al.Estimation of Xian urban non-point source pollution load[J].Water Resources Protection,2010,26(1):9-12,74.(in Chinese))
    [17] 赵人俊.流域水文模拟:新安江模型与陕北模型[M].北京:水利水电出版社,1984.
    [18] 芮孝芳,凌哲,刘宁宁,等.新安江模型的起源及对其进一步发展的建议[J].水利水电科技进展,2012,32(4):1-5.(RUI Xiaofang,LING Zhe,LIU Ningning,et al.Origin of Xinanjiang model and its fuither development[J].Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2012,32(4):1-5.(in Chinese))
    [19] 霍文博,朱跃龙,李致家,等.新安江模型和支持向量机模型实时洪水预报应用比较[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(4):283-289.(HUO Wenbo,ZHU Yuelong,LI Zhijia,et al.Comparison of Xinanjiang model and Support Vector Machine model in the application of real-time flood forecasting[J].Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences),2018,46(4):283-289.(in Chinese))
    [20] 杨哲,张行南,夏达忠,等.基于包气带厚度的流域蓄水容量计算及水文模拟[J].水力发电学报,2015,34(3):8-13.(YANG Zhe,ZHANG Xingnan,XIA Dazhong,et al.Calculation of maximum thickness of unsaturated zone and modeling of hydrological process in Xingxing watershed[J].Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering,2015,34(3):8-13.(in Chinese))
    [21] 刘家宏,周晋军,邵薇薇.城市高耗水现象及其机理分析[J].水资源保护,2018,34(3):17-21.(LIU Jiahong,ZHOU Jinjun,SHAO Weiwei.Analysis of urban high water dissipation phenomenon and its mechanism[J].Water Resources Protection,2018,34(3):17-21.(in Chinese))
引用本文

俞彦,张行南,张鹏,等.基于SCS模型和新安江模型的雨量预警指标综合动态阈值对比[J].水资源保护,2020,36(3):28-33.(YU Yan, ZHANG Xingnan, ZHANG Peng, et al. Comparison of comprehensive dynamic threshold of rainfall warning indicators based on SCS model and Xinanjiang model[J]. Water Resources Protection,2020,36(3):28-33.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1830
  • 下载次数: 4168
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-05-13
  • 出版日期: 2020-05-20