论港口国执行管辖制度对欧盟海运ETS域外管辖的限制———兼及中国应对策略
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D922.6

基金项目:

重庆市社会科学规划博士项目(2015BS047);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(14YJC820079)


The Limitation of Port State Enforcement Jurisdiction to the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of EU Marine ETS and China's Countermeasures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    继欧盟将国际航空纳入其单边ETS之后,欧盟一直积极筹划就国际海运也采取类似措施。但如果欧盟继续沿用其在航空领域的做法,要求外国船舶为其涉欧航程的全部碳排放购买相应排放配额的话,对外国船舶在欧盟管辖海域以外的排放行为,欧盟海运ETS将构成一种域外管辖。尽管根据国际海洋法,欧盟可以基于港口国地位对船舶域外行为行使一定的管辖权,但这种域外管辖的合法性取决于其执行措施是否符合国际海洋法的规定。欧盟海运ETS代表了发达国家一个新的海运单边主义动向,对此,中国应及早研究因应之策。

    Abstract:

    After integrating international aviation into EUETS,EU prepares to fake similar measure emissions from international shipping. However to hackle it may be an extraterritorial jurisdiction if EU marine ETS fakes similar way as it did in international aviation and covers the whole voyages from non-EU vessels that lake place beyond EU territory in conformity with international law. Ahhough It is permissive for EU marine ETS to expend ids porgy slake jurisdiction beyond EU's jurisdictional sea areas in accordance with international law of the sea to some extent, ids legality depends on what enforcement measures it lake to foreign vessels' entering into EU ports when violation of EU marine ETS happens. The EU marine ETS is a newly-appeared unilateralism. As a resuh,China should pay immediate attention to it and assess ids potential impact on China in advance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡斌.论港口国执行管辖制度对欧盟海运ETS域外管辖的限制———兼及中国应对策略[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,18(1):83-88.(HU Bin. The Limitation of Port State Enforcement Jurisdiction to the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of EU Marine ETS and China's Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2016,18(1):83-88.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-05
  • 出版日期: