老年多维贫困测量:概念与视角的转换——基于A-F法及CLASS数据的实证分析
作者:
中图分类号:

C924.24;D669.6

基金项目:

江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金(2017SJB0558);河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2018B30814)


MultiDimensional Measurement of the Elderly: Transformation of Concept and Perspective: An Empirical Analysis Based on AF Method and CLASS Data
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在人口老龄化趋势不断加剧与精准扶贫发展背景下,老年贫困问题日益成为社会关注的重点和难点。识别并缓解老年贫困,是检验社会文明和发展程度的重要标志。基于多维贫困理论,运用AlkireFoster方法构建老年多维贫困测算模型。依据2014年中国城乡老年人生活状况抽样调查数据(CLASS),以11个省(区)老年人为研究对象,从经济收入、住房保障、健康程度、养老服务、可行能力、社会参与、精神状态等7个维度进行测算。结果表明:收入并非老年贫困唯一致因,随着维度增加,老人贫困规模扩大、贫困程度加深;城乡、区域多维贫困差距增大。因此,应加强对老人贫困多维度识别与测量,对不同类型贫困老人提供“问题响应型”或“需求响应型”等多样化帮扶措施,有针对性地构建多主体、分类分层的帮扶网络和保障体系。

    Abstract:

    The poverty of the elderly is becoming the focus and difficulty of the society in the context of aging trend and targetedpoverty alleviation. Identifying and alleviating poverty of the elderly is the symbol of social civilization. Based on the Multidimensional Poverty Theory, this paper uses AlkireFoster method, analyses the elderly in 11 provinces by measurement from seven dimensions which include income, house security, state of health, pension service, capability approach, social participation and mental condition according to the data of China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey in 2014(CLASS). The study shows that income is not the only cause of poverty among the elderly. With the increase of dimensions, the scale of poverty among the elderly increases and the degree of poverty deepens; The multidimensional poverty gap between urban and rural areas is large. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the multidimensional identification and measurement of the poverty in the elderly and provide diversified assistance measures such as “problem response” or “demand response” to different types to build a multiagent, classified and hierarchical support network and guarantee system.

    参考文献
    [1]阿玛蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任赜,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:8.
    [2]ALKIRE S,FOSTER J. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement[J].Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(7):476-484.
    [3]BATTISTON D,CRUCES G,LOPEZCALVA L F,et al. Income and beyond: multidimensional poverty in six Latin American countries[J].Social Indicators Research,2013,112(2):291-314.
    [4]韩振燕,郑娜娜.空巢老人心理需求与老年社会服务发展探析——基于南京市鼓楼区的调查研究[J].西北人口,2011(2):102-106.
    [5]陈友华,苗国.老年贫困与社会救助[J].山东社会科学,2015(7):104-113.
    [6]王三秀.积极老龄化与我国老年贫困治理路径新探索[J].江淮论坛,2016(1):132-137.
    [7]林闽钢.新历史条件下“弱有所扶”:何以可能,何以可为?[J].理论探讨,2018(1):42-46.
    [8]王小林,SABINA A.中国多维贫困测量:估计和政策含义[J].中国农村经济,2009(12):4-10.
    [9]高翔,王三秀.农村老年多维贫困的精准测量与影响因素分析[J].宏观质量研究,2017(2):61-71.
    [10]杨菊华,陈志光.老年绝对经济贫困的影响因素:一个定量和定性分析[J].老龄问题研究,2010(34):51-67.
    [11]仇凤仙.社会排斥与贫困:农村老人贫困问题结构性分析——以安徽省泗县大李村调查为例[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2011(1):40-44.
    [12]江燕娟,李放.可行能力视角下贫困老年人的养老服务政策支持——基于南京市政府购买养老服务案例的研究[J].社会保障研究,2017(6):30-37.
    [13]丁百仁.失能老人的幸福感现状及其影响因素[J].人口与社会,2017(3):53-63.
    [14]乐章,刘二鹏.家庭禀赋、社会福利与农村老年贫困研究[J].农业经济问题,2016(8):63-73.
    [15]陈辉,张全红.基于多维贫困测度的贫困精准识别及精准扶贫对策——以粤北山区为例[J].广东财经大学学报,2016(3):64-71.
    [16]郝璐.多维贫困视角下我国城镇贫困标准研究[D].北京:北京化工大学,2015:24-25.
    [17]FAFCHAMPS M,KEBEDE B.Subjective wellbeing,disability and adaptation: a case study from rural Ethiopia[M].New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK,2012:2-5.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

韩振燕,夏 林.老年多维贫困测量:概念与视角的转换——基于A-F法及CLASS数据的实证分析[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,21(2):79-86.(HAN Zhenyan, et al. MultiDimensional Measurement of the Elderly: Transformation of Concept and Perspective: An Empirical Analysis Based on AF Method and CLASS Data[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2019,21(2):79-86.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1837
  • 下载次数: 1944
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-04-22