论我国环境公益诉讼原告主体资格的拓展与抑制
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D922.6;D925

基金项目:

河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(B200203030;B200202240);江苏省社会科学基金重点项目(19FA002)


On the Restraint and Expansion of Plaintiff’s Subject Qualification in Environmental Public Interest Litigation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    环境权理论、公共信托理论和私人总检察长理论指引着环境公益诉讼主体资格拓展的方向。国外环境公益诉讼主体资格的制度演变呈现出拓展与抑制共存的基本方略。我国现行环境公益诉讼原告主体资格制度存在公民资格缺位、环保组织资格缺乏活力、行政机关资格模糊、检察机关资格明确但不完善等问题,导致制度实效难以充分发挥。环境公益诉讼的原告主体资格亟需采取循序渐进的方式予以拓展,并最终建立环保组织、生态环境行政机关为主,检察机关为辅,公民直接起诉为补充的多元协调共治的原告主体资格制度,同时亦需设置必要的配套措施,以抑制主体资格范围过宽所带来的负面效果。

    Abstract:

    The theory of environmental right, the theory of public trust and the theory of private attorney general guide the direction of expanding the subject qualification of environmental public interest litigation. The development of the system of subject qualification of environmental public interest litigation in foreign countries presents the basic strategy of coexistence of expanding and restraining. The current environmental public interest litigation system in China has such problems as the absence of the qualification of the citizen plaintiff, the lack of vitality of the qualification of the environmental organization plaintiff, the ambiguity of the qualification of the administrative organ plaintiff and the clear but imperfect qualification of the inspection organ plaintiff, which make it difficult to give full play to the actual effect of the system. China should gradually expand the plaintiff of environmental public interest litigation subject qualification, establish the plaintiff’s subject qualification system of pluralistic coordination and cogovernance with environmental protection organizations and ecological environment administrative organs as the main body, procuratorial organs as the auxiliary, and citizens’ direct prosecution as the supplement, and set up necessary supporting measures to prevent the negative effects caused by the too wide scope of subject qualification. 

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙海涛,张志祥.论我国环境公益诉讼原告主体资格的拓展与抑制[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,22(4):97-104.(SUN Haitao, et al. On the Restraint and Expansion of Plaintiff’s Subject Qualification in Environmental Public Interest Litigation[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2020,22(4):97-104.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-09-21
  • 出版日期: