With the development of the “Internet +” program advocated by the country, the traditional medical industry has entered and constantly changed its mode. As a result, various Internet medical industries have emerged. Among them, the most mature Internet medical thirdparty platform not only has the risk caused by the general thirdparty platform, but also has the risk of consultation platform flooding, diagnosis and treatment in the name of consultation, higher risk uncertainty and being captured by interests. The service of the platform is a healthrelated credit product, which is characterized by a high degree of personal dependence, the uncertainty of doctors’ professional level, and patients’ irrationality. They are the causes of risk. In order to eliminate these risks, we need to improve the legislation and make clear the platform’s access standards and the boundaries of consultation and diagnosis and treatment. We need to introduce a negative list system to set restrictions on the scope of Internet medical services. We need to implement the concept of social cogovernance, endow the platform supervision with power and give full play to the advantages of technical supervision. And we also need to clarify the legal responsibilities, and finally realize the inclusive and prudent supervision of the thirdparty medical platform.