生态环境损害赔偿诉讼法律性质新论
作者:
作者单位:

(河海大学法学院,江苏 南京211100 )

作者简介:

晋海(1968—),男,教授,博士,主要从事环境与资源保护法研究。E-mail: njjinhai@163.com ① 本文所称生态环境损害赔偿诉讼,系指狭义上的生态环境损害赔偿诉讼,即政府或其职能部门提起要求相关责任人承担生态修复或赔偿责任的诉讼,不包括社会组织或检察机关提起的环境民事公益诉讼。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D912.6

基金项目:

江苏省社会科学基金重点项目(20FXA002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(B220207034)


A New Analysis of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation Litigation System
Author:
Affiliation:

(School of Law, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    厘清诉讼的法律性质,是科学构建诉讼制度的重要前提。关于生态环境损害赔偿诉讼法律性质,学界仍未形成共识,有特殊环境民事公益诉讼说、国益诉讼说、私益诉讼说、混合诉讼说、特别诉讼说等观点。生态环境损害赔偿制度的救济对象是生态环境损害,而非自然资源损害。生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的正当性基础是政府及其部门的环境监管职责,而非自然资源国家所有权。生态环境损害赔偿责任的法律性质是公法责任,而非私法责任。对于生态修复问题,“公法责任,私法操作”引发诸多问题,“公法责任,公法操作”符合环境保护行政权主导、司法权监督之原则及域外经验。“生态损害赔偿司法监督”的路径是,政府及其部门在追究责任者行政责任时,对于重大案件可采取诉讼的行政执法机制。生态环境损害赔偿诉讼应定位为行政执法诉讼。

    Abstract:

    Clarifying the nature of the ecological environmental damage compensation litigation is the basic prerequisite for constructing the ecological environmental damage compensation system. Regarding the nature of ecological environmental damage compensation litigation, there are theories of special environmental civil public interest litigation, national interest litigation, private interest litigation, mixed litigation, special litigation in the academic community. The protection object of the ecological environmental damage compensation system is the ecological environment, not natural resources. The legitimacy of the litigation for ecological environmental damage is based on environmental supervision duties of the government and its departments, not the state ownership of natural resources. The legal nature of liability for ecological environmental damage compensation is public law responsibility, not private law responsibility. Regarding the issue of ecological restoration, “public law responsibility but private law operation” has caused many problems. “Public law responsibility and public law operation” conforms to the principle of environmental protection administrative power leading, judicial power supervision and extraterritorial experience. The path of “judicial supervision of ecological damage compensation” is that when the government and its departments investigate the administrative responsibility of the responsible person, they can adopt an administrative law enforcement mechanism through litigation for major cases. The ecological environment damage compensation lawsuit should be positioned as an administrative law enforcement lawsuit.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

晋海,许正豪.生态环境损害赔偿诉讼法律性质新论[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,24(4):107-115.(JIN Hai. A New Analysis of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation Litigation System[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2022,24(4):107-115.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-13
  • 出版日期: