权力-技术-生活:乡村数字治理的三重逻辑及平衡
作者:
作者单位:

(云南大学政府管理学院)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Power, Technology, and Life: The Triple Logics and Dynamic Balance of Rural Digital Governance
Author:
Affiliation:

(School of Government, Yunnan University)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    乡村数字治理是数智时代乡村治理的新趋向与新动力,承载着国家数字整合和村民美好生活建构的重要功能。基于韧性治理理论,构建权力-技术-生活的理论分析框架,提出乡村数字治理的本质是权力逻辑、技术逻辑与生活逻辑的有机统一和平衡,其重心不在“技术”而在“生活”,目标亦不是盲目引进大量数字平台进行“炫技”,而是真正使数字治理能够改善村民生活、优化公共服务并回应村民需求。现阶段,乡村数字治理更多受权力和技术逻辑制约而忽视生活逻辑,三重逻辑的价值张力与失衡导致乡村数字治理存在结构单一、数字悬浮和生活脱节三大问题。未来应构建具有包容性、调适性的乡村数字韧性治理模式:在治理权力方面,以“回归农民”为主旨,建立和完善党建引领的多主体协同治理格局和数字治理规则;在技术赋能方面,以“回归价值理性”为指向,坚持“治术”与“治道”统一,实现数字技术重塑乡村治理全过程、全流程;在日常生活方面,以“回归美好生活”为目标,以明确公权与私权边界为核心,以提升村民数字素养和数字能力为重点,满足农民生活需求,构建乡村数字生活共同体。

    Abstract:

    Rural digital governance has emerged as a new trend and driving force of rural governance in the digital-intelligent era. It not only carries the mission of state-led digital integration but also plays a crucial role in shaping the well-being of rural residents. Drawing on the resilience governance theory, this paper constructs an analytical framework of power-technology-life, and argues that the essence of rural digital governance lies in the organic unity and dynamic balance of the three logics. Its focus is not on “technology for technology’s sake”, but on “life-centered governance”. The ultimate goal is not to showcase digital platforms as symbols of modernization, but to embed digital tools into the fabric of rural society to improve villagers’ livelihoods, enhance public services, and respond to villagers’ needs. At present, however, rural digital governance is still dominated by power and technology logics, while the life logic remains marginalized, resulting in three major challenges: structural simplification, “digital suspension”, and disconnection from everyday life. To address these dilemmas, this paper proposes building an inclusive and adaptive model of resilient rural digital governance through three pathways: in terms of governance power, “returning to the villagers” by constructing a Party-led, multi-actor collaborative structure supported by digital governance rules; in terms of technological empowerment, “returning to value rationality” by integrating technical instruments with governance principles to reshape governance processes in their entirety; in terms of everyday life, “returning to the pursuit of a good life” by clarifying the boundaries between public and private rights, enhancing villagers’ digital literacy and capacities, meeting villagers’ life needs, and building a rural digital life community.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张玉强.权力-技术-生活:乡村数字治理的三重逻辑及平衡[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,27(5):89-97.(ZHANG Yuqiang. Power, Technology, and Life: The Triple Logics and Dynamic Balance of Rural Digital Governance[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2025,27(5):89-97.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-12
  • 出版日期: