“系统-生活世界”视域下大模型时代的全球秩序——GPT的霸权秩序与DeepSeek的全球协商化构建
作者:
作者单位:

(1.华东政法大学政府管理学院;2. 复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Global Order in the Era of Large Models from the Perspective of the “System-Lifeworld”: GPT’s Hegemonic Order and DeepSeek’s Globally Negotiated Construction
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Government, East China University of Political Science and Law;2.School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Fudan University)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以GPT和DeepSeek为代表的AI大模型对全球秩序产生了深刻的影响。引入“系统-生活世界”理论对大模型进行分析,可揭示闭源霸权与开源协商两种技术路径对全球秩序的不同建构逻辑,实现该理论从现代性批判到全球数字秩序解析的范式拓展。以GPT为代表的闭源大模型不断加强以美国为中心的全球霸权,企图成为大模型时代的全球“数字系统”;而开源的DeepSeek则成为推动全球协商化构建的新兴技术力量,力图构建全球“数字生活世界”。GPT技术力图构建全球“数字系统”的技术霸权和文化霸权,并消解多元主体间的交往理性,其技术训练路径对数据积累和算力储备提出非常高的要求,形成了一条垄断式的大模型发展之路。同时,AI寡头企业通过GPT推动全球场域内的知识“单向涵化”,并促进知识帝国主义的再生产。以DeepSeek为代表的新兴技术则是一种变革性力量,能够推动大模型的全球“共有、共治与共享”发展,促进全球数字空间的知识“交互涵化”和协商化构建,在技术和文化“双重场域”构筑多主体间的交往理性,并构建全球“数字生活世界”。

    Abstract:

    AI large-scale models, exemplified by GPT and DeepSeek, have had a profound impact on the global order. Extending the “system-lifeworld” theory to the large language models not only uncovers how the two technological trajectories of closed-source hegemony and open-source cooperation differently construct the global order, but also achieves a paradigmatic shift of the theory from a critique of modernity to an interpretation of the global digital order. Closed-source large models epitomized by GPT are progressively reinforcing U.S.-centric global hegemony, seeking to establish a worldwide “digital System”. Conversely, open-source counterparts like DeepSeek emerge as transformative technological forces facilitating globally negotiated construction, thereby endeavoring to shape a global “digital lifeworld”. The GPT technology endeavors to construct a global “digital system” that consolidates technological and cultural hegemony, while eroding the communicative rationality among pluralistic actors within intersubjective interactions. Its technical training paradigm imposes exceptionally high demands for data accumulation and computational reserves, forging a monopolistic developmental trajectory for large-scale models. Concurrently, AI oligopolies leverage GPT to advance “uni-acculturation” of knowledge across global domains, thereby perpetuating the reproduction of knowledge imperialism. DeepSeek, however, functions as a transformative force. DeepSeek facilitates the global development of large-scale models towards “co-ownership, co-governance, and sharing”, promoting “trans-acculturation” of knowledge and negotiated construction within the global digital space. This fosters communicative rationality among pluralistic actors across technological and cultural “dual fields”, thereby constructing a global “digital lifeworld”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

叶文杰,高奇琦.“系统-生活世界”视域下大模型时代的全球秩序——GPT的霸权秩序与DeepSeek的全球协商化构建[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,27(5):137-147.(YE Wenjie, GAO Qiqi. Global Order in the Era of Large Models from the Perspective of the “System-Lifeworld”: GPT’s Hegemonic Order and DeepSeek’s Globally Negotiated Construction[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2025,27(5):137-147.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-12
  • 出版日期: