制度逻辑的演化如何重塑养老服务生态——基于普惠养老服务数智化转型的纵向案例研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1.武汉大学社会保障研究中心 ;2.武汉大学政治与公共管理学院)

作者简介:

王增文(1980—),男,教授,博士,主要从事社会保障理论与政策研究。E-mail:wzwlm922@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(25JZD039);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72574171);教育部哲学社会科学实验室-合肥工业大学“数据科学与智慧社会治理实验室”研究项目(DSSSG2024P02)


How Does the Evolution of Institutional Logics Reshapes the Elderly Care Service Ecosystem? A Longitudinal Case Study of Digital-Intelligent Transformation in Inclusive Elderly Care
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Center for Social Security Studies, Wuhan University;2.School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    普惠养老服务数智化转型是由外生技术机遇与内生治理矛盾共同驱动的制度变迁过程。基于W市的纵向案例,将该市普惠养老服务数智化转型历程划分为信息化奠基、数字化整合与智慧化融合3个阶段,且发现:第一,随阶段演化,转型核心矛盾焦点从信息黑箱、数据孤岛演进至服务效能缺口。第二,转型进程由国家、科层、市场、社区及数智五类制度逻辑间的权力关系与兼容性强弱共同塑造,互动形态依次经历“挤出-吸纳”“竞争”与“融合”3个递进阶段。第三,行动者策略随制度逻辑互动情境而变化,在科层逻辑高度中心化、其他逻辑被挤出的情境下,行动者普遍采取依附式策略,以服从主导逻辑换取合法性与资源;在多重逻辑互动深化情境下,行动者面临源自不同制度逻辑且存在张力的合法性评判标准,策略因而分化为选择性策略、吸纳型策略及联盟型策略;老年群体也在此过程中实现了被动数据客体到主动治理参与者的角色跃迁。第四,每一阶段的制度产出会反馈为新的矛盾诱因,驱动下一阶段的制度变迁。因此,当前的智慧化融合阶段并非转型终点,而是新制度调适的开始,其面临数据权属、算法责任与生态垄断等新兴挑战,推动转型的关键在于识别不同阶段主导的制度逻辑冲突形态,并设计差异化的干预节点与协调工具。

    Abstract:

    The digital-intelligent transformation of inclusive elderly care services constitutes an institutional change process jointly driven by exogenous technological opportunities and endogenous governance contradictions. Based on a longitudinal case study of City W, this paper partitions its transformation trajectory into three stages, namely, informatization foundation, digital integration, and intelligent integration, and yields four principal findings. First, as the transformation is driven by exogenous technological opportunities and endogenous governance contradictions, the focal contradictions evolve from the information black box to data silos, and ultimately to the service efficacy gap. Second, the transformation trajectory is co-shaped by the power relations and compatibility among five institutional logics—state, bureaucratic, market, community, and digital-intelligent—whose interactions progress through three escalating modes: crowding-out-and-absorption, competition, and integration. Third, actor strategies shift systematically with the configuration of institutional logics. Under a highly centralized bureaucratic logic that crowds out competing logics, actors converge on dependency strategies, trading compliance for legitimacy and resources; as multiple logics deepen their interaction and actors confront legitimacy criteria rooted in divergent logics, strategies diversify into selective, absorptive, and coalitional forms. Additionally, older adults undergo a role transition from passive data objects to substantive governance participants. Fourth, the institutional outputs of each stage feed back as new sources of contradiction, propelling institutional change in the subsequent stage. The current intelligent-integration stage, therefore, marks not an endpoint but the onset of renewed institutional adaptation, confronting emergent challenges of data ownership, algorithmic accountability, and ecosystem monopolization. Advancing the transformation hinges on identifying the dominant modality of logic conflict at each stage and designing stage-specific intervention points and coordinating instruments.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王增文,罗佩玲.制度逻辑的演化如何重塑养老服务生态——基于普惠养老服务数智化转型的纵向案例研究[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,28(2):52-67.(WANG Zengwen, LUO Peiling. How Does the Evolution of Institutional Logics Reshapes the Elderly Care Service Ecosystem? A Longitudinal Case Study of Digital-Intelligent Transformation in Inclusive Elderly Care[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2026,28(2):52-67.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-12
  • 出版日期: