习近平党建思想视域下请示报告制度的建构逻辑——基于维护中央权威的考察
作者:
作者单位:

(1.江苏省社会科学院马克思主义研究院;2.中共江苏省委党校马克思主义学院)

作者简介:

陈朋(1979—),男,研究员,博士,主要从事政党政治与基层治理研究。E-mail:732177843@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD043)


The Construction Logic of the System of Reporting and Requesting Instructions from the Perspective of Xi Jinping’s Thought on Party Building: An Inquiry Centered on Upholding the Authority of the CPC Central Committee
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Institute of Marxism, Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Social Sciences;2.School of Marxism, Party School of the C.P.C. Jiangsu Committee )

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    权威是请示报告制度建构的原初逻辑。百余年来,请示报告制度历经了新民主主义革命时期的发轫确立、社会主义革命和建设时期的探索拓展、改革开放和社会主义现代化建设新时期的恢复发展,直至新时代以来的系统规范。请示报告制度有效运行的内在机理,不仅体现为信息突破科层制的跨越式传递与分殊化处置,达成上下级之间高效的信息交互,而且也体现为通过明确的规则清单,发挥制度的引导与约束功能,规范组织与个人行为。请示报告制度的优化应聚焦3个层面:从“信息传递”迈向“有效信息传递”,通过强化政治自觉和明确惩戒举措等防止可能出现的信息传递失真、滞后问题;从“一般通用”迈向“领域细分”,在充分了解不同领域执行请示报告制度差异的基础上,针对不同层级、不同类型的请示报告事项作出差异化规范;从“遵从程序”迈向“主动赋能”,通过明确权责边界并优化考核机制,在维护党中央集中统一领导的同时,激发各级组织的主观能动性,防止出现“重程序、轻实效”的情况。

    Abstract:

    “Authority” constitutes the foundational logic underpinning the development of the system of reporting and requesting instructions. Over the past century, this system has traversed distinct historical stages: its inception and establishment during the New Democratic Revolution, its exploration and expansion during the socialist revolution and construction period, its restoration and growth during the reform and opening-up and the new period of socialist modernization, culminating in its systematic standardization since the advent of the new era. Throughout this evolution, it has consistently served the fundamental objective of consolidating the authority of the Party. The internal mechanism governing the effective operation of this system manifests in two dimensions. On one hand, it facilitates the cross-hierarchical transmission and differentiated processing of information, thereby achieving efficient vertical information exchange between superior and subordinate levels. On the other hand, through explicit regulatory lists, it leverages institutional guidance and constraints to standardize the conduct of both organizations and individuals. Consequently, the optimization of this system should focus on three strategic shifts: transitioning from mere “information transmission” to “effective information transmission”, which entails preventing information distortion and delays in execution by strengthening political consciousness and clarifying disciplinary measures; shifting from “generalized application” to “domain-specific refinement”, namely, based on a thorough understanding of the variances across different sectors, differentiated regulations should be formulated for entities at various levels and of different types to reduce ambiguity in implementation; and evolving from “procedural compliance” to “active empowerment”, namely, by delineating power-responsibility boundaries and optimizing evaluation mechanisms, the system can safeguard the centralized and unified leadership of the CPC Central Committee while simultaneously stimulating the initiative and creativity of organizations at all levels, thereby averting the pitfall of “prioritizing procedure over efficacy”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈朋,徐岑琛.习近平党建思想视域下请示报告制度的建构逻辑——基于维护中央权威的考察[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,28(3):1-11.(CHEN Peng, XU Cenchen. The Construction Logic of the System of Reporting and Requesting Instructions from the Perspective of Xi Jinping’s Thought on Party Building: An Inquiry Centered on Upholding the Authority of the CPC Central Committee[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2026,28(3):1-11.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-13
  • 出版日期: