发展分化与分类治理:新时代农村党建的类型化考察
作者:
作者单位:

(1.上海交通大学马克思主义学院;2.中共浙江省委党校全面从严治党研究中心)

作者简介:

张震(1993—),男,博士研究生,主要从事党的建设与基层治理研究。E-mail:zjdxzhangzhen@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目(25CDJ070)


Development Differentiation and Classified Governance: A Typological Investigation of Rural Party Building in the New Era
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Marxism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University;2.Research Center for Comprehensively Strengthening Party Discipline, Party School of Zhejiang Provincial Committee of C.P.C)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    习近平党建思想是新时代农村党建的行动指南,农村的发展与治理是推进乡村振兴战略、实现城乡融合发展及提升国家治理能力现代化的重要支撑。改革开放以来,农村发展逐渐分化,党建工作的外部社会环境和资源基础发生深刻变化,传统工作模式难以有效适配日益分化的现实发展和治理需求。面对农村党建复合型功能发挥和基层社会结构性变迁的新挑战,构建基于农村发展水平和党组织组织力的二维分析框架,在将农村党建类型划分为引领发展型、悬浮松散型、行政动员型、空心内卷型的基础上,系统探讨每种类型的特征、成因及典型案例。农村基层党建的形态差异并非随机分布的偶发现象,而是特定的村域社会发展基础与党组织主体行动能力在特定时空场域内双向互构的结果。通过对农村党建4种类型的深度剖析,基于农村基层党组织功能有效发挥的目标任务,提出了实施规范化示范、嵌入式重塑、内生化赋能与结构性再造等差异化治理策略,旨在实现基层党组织建设与农村发展治理的精准匹配。农村党建的类型学分析既能够对以往整体化的研究取向形成理论补充,也能够对新时代农村党建实践有所启发。

    Abstract:

    Xi Jinping Thought on Party building serves as the guide for rural Party building in the new era,Rural development and governance serve as crucial pillars in advancing the rural revitalization strategy, achieving integrated urban-rural development, and modernizing national governance capabilities. Since the reform and opening-up, rural development has gradually diverged, and profound changes have occurred in the external social environment and resource base of Party building work. Traditional work models struggle to effectively adapt to the increasingly diverse realities of development and governance needs. Faced with new challenges posed by the complex functions of rural Party building and structural changes in grassroots society, a two-dimensional analytical framework based on “rural development level” and “Party organization capacity” is constructed. Based on the classification of rural Party building types into leading development type, suspended and loose type, administrative mobilization type, and hollow and involution type, the characteristics, causes, and typical cases of each type are systematically explored. The morphological differences in rural grassroots Party building are not a random, accidental phenomenon, but rather the result of a bidirectional mutual construction between specific village-level social development foundations and the action capabilities of Party organizations within a specific temporal and spatial field. Through in-depth analysis of the four types of rural Party building, and based on the goal of effectively exerting the functions of rural grassroots Party organizations, differentiated governance strategies such as standardized demonstration, embedded reshaping, endogenous empowerment, and structural reconstruction are proposed, aiming to achieve precise matching between grassroots Party organization construction and rural development governance. The typological analysis of rural Party building not only provides theoretical supplements to previous holistic research orientations but also offers insights into rural Party building practices in the new era.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张震.发展分化与分类治理:新时代农村党建的类型化考察[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,28(4):13-24.(Zhang Zhen. Development Differentiation and Classified Governance: A Typological Investigation of Rural Party Building in the New Era[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Socail Sciences),2026,28(4):13-24.(in Chinese))

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-13
  • 出版日期: