工具理性约束与价值理性嵌入: 社会救助算法决策的风险审视与防范机制构建
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

电子科技大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F126;D632.1??

基金项目:

Keywords: Social assistance; Algorithmic empowerment; Predictive governance; AI hallucination; Digital exclusion


Instrumental Rationality Constraints and Value Rationality Embedding: Risk Examination and Mechanism Construction for Algorithmic Decision-Making in Social Assistance
Author:
Affiliation:

电子科技大学

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来随着人工智能的持续发展,算法赋能逐渐成为社会救助体系高质量发展的重要动力。研究致力于把握算法赋能社会救助决策的底层运作逻辑,深入剖析其可能诱发的异化风险,进而寻找针对性的优化策略。研究发现,算法通过“感知需求—配置资源—协同治理”的内在逻辑赋能社会救助决策,实现了隐性需求的显性化、资源配置的精准化以及治理行动的协同化。然而,当算法模型深入赋能社会救助决策后,也产生了错综复杂的风险隐患:其一是技术层面的“算法黑箱”对程序正义的遮蔽,即决策过程透明度低且难以解释;其二是制度层面的权责边界模糊导致的监管领域真空,即决策失误时难以厘清算法开发者与基层工作人员的责任归属问题;其三则是价值层面过度扩张的工具理性消解了受助者主体地位,甚至引发新型的数字排斥现象。为解决上述困境,研究构建了“技术—制度—价值”三位一体的治理逻辑,通过构建可解释与可审计的算法机制重塑技术信任,依托全链条问责体系锚定人机协同权责,并推动技术理性向人文价值回归,建设及时、有效的现代化社会救助新格局。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: With the continuous advancement of the wave of artificial intelligence, algorithmic empowerment has gradually become a key engine for the social assistance system to move towards a high-quality development stage. The research is devoted to grasping the underlying operation logic of algorithm empowering social assistance decision-making, deeply excavating the alienation risk that may be induced, and then exploring targeted optimization strategies. It is found that the algorithm relies on the internal logic of the chain of ' perceived demand-allocation of resources-collaborative governance ', realizes the explicitization of implicit demand, the precision of resource allocation and the coordination of governance actions, and promotes the paradigm transformation of social assistance from ' passive relief after the event ' to ' active monitoring before the event '. However, when digital intelligence technology is deeply embedded in social assistance decision-making, there are also complex risks and hidden dangers : first, the ' algorithm black box ' at the technical level obscures procedural justice, making the decision-making process difficult to be reasonably explained and easy to solidify prejudice ; the second is that the fuzzy boundary of power and responsibility at the institutional level leads to a vacuum in the regulatory field, resulting in the dilution of responsibilities; the third is that the excessive expansion of instrumental rationality at the value level dispels the dominant position of the recipients, and even leads to a new type of digital exclusion. In response to these pain points, this study attempts to build a ' technology-system-value ' trinity governance logic : reshape technology trust by constructing an interpretable and auditable algorithm mechanism, anchor human-machine coordination rights and responsibilities based on the whole chain accountability system, and promote the return of technical rationality to humanistic value, so as to build a new pattern of modern social assistance with both wisdom and humanity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

匡亚林.工具理性约束与价值理性嵌入: 社会救助算法决策的风险审视与防范机制构建[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),,():

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-14
  • 最后修改日期:2026-07-10
  • 录用日期:2026-09-16
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: